“We could have held hearings before the markup and carefully crafted bipartisan legislation together,” Meeks said Tuesday. Meeks said the DATA Act was “unvetted” and had been thrust on his staff with little warning. “In the meanwhile, we can be having hearings and conversations, bringing in witnesses and experts on sanctions.” “I don’t want to supersede CFIUS,” Meeks said. In a brief conversation with reporters on Tuesday, he said Democrats are open to “more conversation and dialogue” on a TikTok ban - but, he added, “we have to have all of the facts.” Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.), the committee’s ranking member, disputed the notion that Democrats would oppose any bill that targets TikTok. Its critics, however, point to requirements in Chinese law that require companies based in-country to comply with any and all requests from state intelligence services. The committee ultimately advanced McCaul’s DATA Act on Wednesday morning.īyteDance, TikTok’s China-based parent company, has long denied any association with Beijing’s surveillance or propaganda operations.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |